RE: RSVP Graceful Restart

[Nurit Sprecher <nurit.sprecher@SeabridgeNetworks.com>]

Thanks for responding me. I am glad to see a (in the way) standard for the
Ingress recovery.
Regarding the FRR and Graceful restart I am not sure that the protocol
should not be modified. I'll investigate the issue next week and let you
know. But for sure an informational section should be applied.
Best regards, Nurit.

-----Original Message-----
From: Reshad Rahman [mailto:rrahman@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 02:21
To: Nurit Sprecher
Cc: 'ancaz@cisco.com'; 'jisrar@cisco.com'; 'mpls@uu.net';
'ccamp@ops.ietf.org'
Subject: Re: RSVP Graceful Restart

Nurit Sprecher wrote:

>Hi,
>I did not have the chance yet to read the draft, but I really believe there
>is a need to extend the general description in the GMPL document.
>I hope that you new definition for the ERO recovery would help also to let
>the Ingress LER to recover.
>

Hi,

Yes, this will also let the ingress recover the ERO.

>
>One more thing that I would like to see in the extension, is how graceful
>restart works together with Fast Reroute Protection. Specifically the
>problematic points are the MP and the PLR. Do you have any intention to
>cover it as well?
>
Regarding GR + FRR, we currently believe that an informational section
would be sufficient, i.e. no need for protocol extensions.

Regards,
Reshad.

>
>Thanks in advance, Nurit.
> 
>