RE: spc connections

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Ong, Lyndon wrote:

> I respectfully disagree with the suggestion, as
> 7713.2/3474 provides a valid solution that does not
> require changes to the text to begin with.

Here's how I look at it: explicit label control as described in 3473
appears not to be clearly understood.  Therefore, a clearer
explanation is needed in any case.  Given that, the choice is between:

	3473+explanation: works without a new object, has label
		control per hop, is trivially backward compatible
and	7713.2: needs a new (to 3473) object, has only egress label
		control, needs interworking spec with interoperate
		with 3473 (assuming interworking issues are fixed)

Kireeti.
-------