Inter-area requirements

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Jim Boyle says...

> I also encourage the members of CCAMP to review my original draft, at
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boyle-tewg-interarea-reqts-01.txt
>
> I solicit comments on these 2 inter-area drafts, as well as the TEWG doc
> on inter-as requirements be directed to te-wg@ops.ietf.org
>
> thanks!
>
> Jim

And I concur. It is important that CCAMP plays an active role in the review of the
inter-area requirements because our solutions will have to satisfy the requirements.

Adrian

>
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jean Philippe Vasseur wrote:
>
> > copying CCAMP for comments.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > JP.
> >
> > >Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:25:20 -0500
> > >To: te-wg@ops.ietf.org
> > >From: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
> > >Subject: MPLS Inter-area TE requirement draft
> > >Cc: ejk@tech.org, Jim Boyle <jboyle@pdnets.com>, bwijnen@lucent.com,
> > >jeanlouis.leroux@francetelecom.com, Raymond_Zhang@infonet.com, Kenji
> > >Kumaki <ke-kumaki@kddi.com>, Yuichi Ikejiri <y.ikejiri@ntt.com>, Parantap
> > >Lahiri <parantap.lahiri@mci.com>, ting_wo.chung@bell.ca
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Please find attached a new MPLS Inter-area TE requirement draft, which is
> > >truly the collective effort of the SPs on this draft along with comments
> > >we received form others. I took the liberty to send the draft to the list
> > >since it is still not on the IETF site and Bert mentioned that quick
> > >progress should be made on this item.
> > >
> > >Jim, as already mentioned on the list, we would be happy to work with you
> > >on this draft in order to quickly come up with a single draft if you will.
> > >
> > >Thanks in advance for your comment.
> > >
> > >JP.
> >
>
>
>