[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-reqts-01.txt
Some comments.
Section 3. ......The ASON model allows for the protocols used within different control
domains to be different; and for the protocol used between control
domains to be different than the protocols used within control
domains. ......
The routing requirements contained in this draft apply to protocols used between control
domains(E-NNI routing) or protocols used within control domains(I-NNI routing) or both?
...... - For a RA, the cluster of RCs is referred to as a routing domain......
Does this means that RA=routing domain? Maybe routing control domain is
more align with G.7715.
Section 4.2.1 ...... - The second approach places the Level N routing function on a
separate system from the Level N+1 routing function. In this
case, a communication interface must be used between the
systems containing the routing functions for different levels.
This communication interface and mechanisms are outside the
scope of this document. .......
Is it possible that the Level N routing function and the Level N+1 routing function are
from different vendors? If the answer is yes, then I think the communication interface and mechanisms should be defined. Otherwise how can you achieve inter-operate?
Thank you.
-rick
all,
the following version of the "ASON routing requirements" document
completes the template proposed in the v00.txt:
please provide any comment you think relevant in order to progress
this wg i-d
thanks,
- dimitri.
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003