Re: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP

[Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com>]

Adrian,
        I believe the alarm spec document also fell into this category, no?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-01.txt

Much thanks,
Lou

At 06:46 AM 3/4/2004 -0500, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> All,
>
> At the CCAMP meeting today we discussed making several drafts working 
> group items. Can you
> please express your opinion (yes/no) on whether each of the following 
> drafts is ready to
> become a CCAMP working group draft.
>
> Feel free to express yes with reservations. If you have reservations or 
> objections, please
> express them on the list. if you need anonymity for your comments then 
> please filter them
> through the chairs.
>
> Silence will be taken as meaning nothing, so please say what you think.
>
> GMPLS Signaling Procedure For Egress Control
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-control-01.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-control-01.txt 
>
>
> Generic Tunnel Tracing Protocol (GTTP) Specification
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt 
>
>
> RSVP-TE Extensions in support of End-to-End GMPLS-based Recovery
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-03.txt 
>
>
> GMPLS Based Segment Recovery
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-00.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-00.txt 
>
>
> Thank you,
> Adrian