RE: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP

[Yanhe Fan <yfan@axiowave.com>]

Yes to all.

Yanhe

At 06:46 AM 3/4/2004 -0500, Adrian Farrel wrote:

>All,
>
>At the CCAMP meeting today we discussed making several drafts working 
>group items. Can you
>please express your opinion (yes/no) on whether each of the following 
>drafts is ready to
>become a CCAMP working group draft.
>
>Feel free to express yes with reservations. If you have reservations or 
>objections, please
>express them on the list. if you need anonymity for your comments then 
>please filter them
>through the chairs.
>
>Silence will be taken as meaning nothing, so please say what you think.
>
>GMPLS Signaling Procedure For Egress Control
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-control-01.t
xt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-control-01.
txt 
>
>
>Generic Tunnel Tracing Protocol (GTTP) Specification
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt>http://ww
w.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt 
>
>
>RSVP-TE Extensions in support of End-to-End GMPLS-based Recovery
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-si
gnaling-03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-re
covery-e2e-signaling-03.txt 
>
>
>GMPLS Based Segment Recovery
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recov
ery-00.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segm
ent-recovery-00.txt 
>
>
>Thank you,
>Adrian