RE: draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec to WG status?

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS wrote:

> Yes, should be brought under the wing of the WG.
>
> Jerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 7:21 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec to WG status?
>
> In Seoul we ran out of time before we could discuss this draft.
>
> However, the draft is pretty stable, and it is the opinion of the authors that this should be brought under the wing of the WG.
>
> Can you please send your opinions to the list or to the chairs direct.
>
> Silence (as usual) will be interpreted as you saying nothing.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-01.txt

Thanks Jerry et al for your comments.

While there wasn't ringing approval for moving this forward, there was
reasonable interest.  Lou, please republish as a WG doc.

Kireeti.
-------