RE: Last call on Protection and Restoration Design Team drafts

["Richard Rabbat" <rabbat@fla.fujitsu.com>]

Yes to all,
Richard.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:24 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Last call on Protection and Restoration Design Team drafts
> 
> As discussed in the CCAMP meeting today, the Protection and Restoration
> Design Team drafts
> have been around and stable for a long time.
> 
> The terminology draft (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-03.txt)
> is marked as
> standards track, but clearly does not require an implementation.
> 
> The Functional Analysis draft (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-functional-
> 01.txt) is
> neither marked as informational nor standards track - perhaps the editors
> would like to
> fix this as a last call comment. Nevertheless, this is clearly not aimed
> at having an
> implementation.
> 
> The Recovery Analysis draft (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-
> 02.txt) is
> informational and does not need an implementation.
> 
> 
> This email begins a working group last call on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-03.txt,
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-functional-01.txt and
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-02.txt
> 
> The last call will end on Friday 26th March at 12 noon GMT.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-
> terminology-03.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-
> functional-01.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-
> analysis-02.txt
> 
> Comments to the list or to the chairs direct.
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>