Re: [RE] Layer One VPNs - sorry for the previous email

[Tomonori TAKEDA <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Hi, Young,

Thank you for your comments.

Yes, I think the functional enhancement for UNI (overlay) and NNI (peer) to 
support the Layer 1 VPN is a crucial point for the provider that wants to 
provide connectivity services within limited group of customer devices 
(enhancement from public services). I see that you are in line with this 
important benefit of the L1 VPN. Comments are really appreciated.

At 17:40 04/03/15 +0900, yhwkim@etri.re.kr wrote:

> Hi,
> I think the framework document has good guidelins for realizing the L1VPN 
> in the GMPLS networks.
> I'm not sure that the L1VPN service itself could be included in the CCAMP 
> charter or not, but
> I think functional enhancements for supporting the L1VPN in GMPLS should 
> be covered in the CCAMP.
> Thanks,
> Young
>
>
> > Hi,
> > Although Layer One VPNs do not currently have a home in any IETF 
> working group, we were
> > the recipients of a liaison from ITU-T SG13 informing us about the 
> work they are doing on
> > this topic and pointing us at
> > 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-00.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-00.txt 
>
> > If anyone has comments on this work they can send them to this 
> mailing list (until another
> > home is found in the IETF) or to the authors direct.
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian

-----
Tomonori TAKEDA
NTT Network Service Systems Lab.
Phone: +81-422-59-7434