RE: Node-id Hello - standards track or BCP?

["zafar ali" <zali@cisco.com>]

Dear Adrian and Ccampers:

We have also updated the ID based on the comments received from the list
and contribution from Dimitri. The updated version should appear at the
list shortly, in the mean time mirror copy can be found at, 

http://multimedia.ecn.purdue.edu/~ali/ietf59/draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-node-i
d-based-hello-01.txt

Comments and suggestions will be appreciated. 

N.b. IMO this draft belongs to BCP category and does NOT change protocol
behavior. 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:39 PM
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: Node-id Hello - standards track or BCP?
>
>
>(or informational?)
>
>The question for you folks is:
>
>does this change protocol behavior (standards track)
>or narrow the choices for an implementation (BCP)
>or describe what some implementations do (informational)
>
>An essential difference between the first and the second might 
>be the behavior that one LSR expects from its neighbor.
>
>Opinions are cheap, but I want them anyway.
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>