RE: Node-id Hello - standards track or BCP?

["Vishal Sharma" <v.sharma@ieee.org>]

Adrian,

I think this is appropriate for the BCP category.

Also, I think Arun brings up a very good point about consistency
with addressing in Path/Resv. messages, and I support the idea that
it would be good to have clarification to this effect in the draft.

-Vishal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:39 PM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Node-id Hello - standards track or BCP?
> 
> 
> (or informational?)
> 
> The question for you folks is:
> 
> does this change protocol behavior (standards track)
> or narrow the choices for an implementation (BCP)
> or describe what some implementations do (informational)
> 
> An essential difference between the first and the second might be 
> the behavior that one
> LSR expects from its neighbor.
> 
> Opinions are cheap, but I want them anyway.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>