[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RE : Proposed strategy for Inter-area/AS

To: LE ROUX Jean-Louis FTRD/DAC/LAN <jeanlouis.leroux@francetelecom.com>
Subject: Re: RE : Proposed strategy for Inter-area/AS
From: ricciato <ricciato@coritel.it>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:48:14 +0200
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <B7D1592DFC5137478D0385A9595C4553011147CD@lanmhs30.rd.francetelecom.fr>
References: <B7D1592DFC5137478D0385A9595C4553011147CD@lanmhs30.rd.francetelecom.fr>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821

Hi JL,

just a quick remark: would it make sense in this case to advertise only a selected subset of the N virtual links (say the two with most residual bw) ?

ciao
fabio

LE ROUX Jean-Louis FTRD/DAC/LAN wrote:

Let's assume that there are N distinct paths from ABR A to a destination X, each with a distinct bandwidth and
distinct admin-group (a path admin group being expressed as a logical AND of the link admin groups along the path)
How can you summarize such topology ? Actually you need to advertise N virtual links, each with a distinct admin-group and available bandwidth.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE : Proposed strategy for Inter-area/AS
  - From: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>

References:
- RE : Proposed strategy for Inter-area/AS
  - From: "LE ROUX Jean-Louis FTRD/DAC/LAN" <jeanlouis.leroux@francetelecom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-01.txt as WG document?
Next by Date: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-egress-control-01.txt
Previous by thread: RE : Proposed strategy for Inter-area/AS
Next by thread: Re: RE : Proposed strategy for Inter-area/AS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread