[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Limitations overcomed by ARO
Alessio, Marco, Ugo, Fabio, Vishal,
As I understand this draft overcomes the following
limitations:
".... we propose an alternative approach, based on the
joint
computation of the two paths in a distributed manner,
which overcomes ..."
"... two main limitations:
- Trapping
- Sub-optimal route selection "
Could you please confirm if the following can be overcomed using the
scheme described (quoted below) in the draft :
* Can the path setup for the first LSP (computed by the head-end) lead
to trapping in the
second area or sub-optimal route selection if the head-end node only has
link state information of the first areas
* Can an ABR in Area 1 & 2 compute paths to avoid trapping in Area 3 if
the ABR in Area 1 & 2 only has link states of these 2 areas?
"While the
path of the first LSP - that is, the one being
installed during the
first phase - is included in the ERO, the route of the
second LSP -
which will be installed in the second phase û will be
collected in
the ARO during the first phase itself. At the end of
the first phase,
the ARO collecting the e2e route of the second LSP is
returned to the
head-end node, which can then install it as an
ER-LSP." ?
* Can a head-end node in AS1 avoid trapping in the network if the
head-end node only knows
about link states in AS1 and the virtual links to other ASes?
"... can model a multi-AS network.
... JSA minimizes the number of areas that
the two LSPs share, and if two area-disjoint paths are
present in the
network, JSA can compute them;"
"Node A computes two disjoint paths between itself and
B,
within area 1, with a inter-area
topological view as
shown in Fig. 5b; in this case, node A
MUST prune all
the border nodes, except one for every
area connected to
area 1, before the disjoint route
selection algorithm is
performed; as a result, the two LSPs will
not cross the
same next area, and will follow the
computed inter-area
path.
Thanks
Cheng-Yin