[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt



Hi Tom,

Quite frankly, Adrian has been helping out in this draft (and others) and his contribution has been a key element of success in trying to achieve/reflect the consensus of many individuals.

Thanks.

JP.

At 08:01 PM 5/13/2004 +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote:
A reasonable request, Tom.
And heaven knows I have enough other stuff to do.

For the record, I took this on in order to drive the work through in a shape that was
agreed by the WG. I'm more than happy to drop to the role of contributing author.


Tom, are you busy? What do you know about multi-area/AS? Could you be the editor?

Thanks,
Adrian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt


> I always have a reservation when the WG chair and the I-D editor are or > turn out to be the same individual. I think that the IETF discourages this > for good reason and so for this to be adopted, I would like someone other > than the WG chair to take the role of (lead) editor. > > Tom Petch > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> > Date: 06 May 2004 22:08 > Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt > > > >Folks, > > > >This draft represents the first step in the much-discussed six point plan > towards > >inter-area/AS solutions. > > > >I would like three things to happen: > > > >a. This draft to become a WG draft > > Please send your opinions > >b. The draft to be reinforced in areas that people consider necessary > > One such area MAY be diverse routing. > > Please send suggested text, but > > - recall that this is not a solutions draft > > - try to keep the length of the draft down below 100 pages > >c. Move on with the next step in the plan. > > At the moment, this seems to require effort on points 2 and 4 > > Viz, develop individual signaling solutions as required and > > state their applicability. > > We await input from those who have preferred solutions. > > > >Cheers, > >Adrian > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> > >To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > >Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> > >Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:44 PM > >Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt > > > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > >> > >> Title : A Framework for Inter-Domain MPLS Traffic Engineering > >> Author(s) : A. Farrel, et al. > >> Filename : draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt > >> Pages : 14 > >> Date : 2004-4-30 > >> > >> This document provides a framework for establishing and controlling > >> Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) > >> Label Switched Paths (LSPs) in multi-domain networks. > >> > >> For the purposes of this document, a domain is considered to be any > >> collection of network elements within a common sphere of address > >> management or path computational responsibility. Examples of such > >> domains include IGP areas and Autonomous Systems. > >> > >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framewo > rk-00.txt > >> > > > > >