RE: draft-rabbat-ccamp-carrier-survey-00.txt [Was: Re: Draft agenda for San Diego]

["Richard Rabbat" <rabbat@fla.fujitsu.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:39 PM
> To: Richard Rabbat
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: draft-rabbat-ccamp-carrier-survey-00.txt [Was: Re: 
> Draft agenda for San Diego]
> 
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> > Sorry, I forgot to cc: the mailing list given the interest.
> 
> >>Hi Adrian,
> >>
> >>We would like to get some 2 to 3 minutes to discuss our 
> survey results 
> >>under the P&R section and how they can be used to advance P&R. 
> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rabbat-ccamp-carri
er-survey-
>>00.txt
>>We're getting some good feedback by email about it and would like to
discuss
>>the next steps and increase the participation of the carriers in the
debate.

> You're not going to get any realistic discussion in 2 to 3 minutes.

[Richard] The purpose is to get feedback on the content, format, etc of the
survey and how to interpret the results. This is carrier feedback that
should be of high interest to everybody. Let's spend 5-6 minutes then to
have a good discussion in parallel with the ML work.

> A better way to handle this, I think, is that the draft is 
> mentioned from the chair (as shown in the draft agenda) and 
> that discussions are taken to the list. Hopefully by doing 
> this we can build on your work to produce a survey that helps 
> us understand the deployment desires and motivations of 
> GMPLS-using providers.

> Cheers,
> Adrian

> PS Feedback and thoughts on the draft to follow.