Thanks for the new version of this draft.
As soon as you get the chance (immediately after San Diego), can you please
resubmit it sorting out the formatting problems and removing all of the
gunk from the end. You don't need to wait for any other changes before you
do that.
OK. I apologize for having the draft with the gunk after the end of document.
We will resubmit it after removing the gunk and fixing the format problems.
Can you please let us know what you think the status of this draft is and
what the proposed category is (informational or standards track)?
The draft is getting mature at the current version. But some issues are still
open, e.g., bi-directional LSP, service interwork function (See Section 4
and 5). In my opinion, the proposed category falls into the category of
standards track since several protocol exertions are needed (virtual FA and
numbered FA).