RE: poll on draft-dimitri-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-bundled-links-00.tx t

[John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>]

Dimitri,

This flag isn't needed.  Once a node selects the component link, it is that
link that is in the RRO.

Thanks,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dimitri papadimitriou [mailto:dpapadimitriou@psg.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 5:47 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: poll on draft-dimitri-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-bundled-links-00.txt
> 
> All, there is one issue that is flagged in Section 7.1 in this draft
> 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dimitri-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-
> bundled-links-00.txt>
> 
> as needing to poll from the working group to see whether to use Session_
> Attributes or LSP_Attributes to flag component link recording and close
> accordingly
> 
> "   If a node desires component link recording, the "Component Link
>     Recording desired" flag (value TBD) should be set in the
>     LSP_ATTRIBUTES object, object that is defined in [RSVP-TE-
>     ATTRIBUTE]. Another alternate is to use an available flag in the
>     SESSION_ATTRIBUTE object [RFC3209]. The later makes the component
>     link recording request similar to the label recording request."
> 
> thanks for the feedback,
> - dimitri