[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Waveband Switching [Was Re: draft-douville-ccamp-gmpls-waveband-extensions-05.txt]



hi adrian, see in-line for additional clarifications on the reasoning

Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi Dimitri,

I'm not sure what you are asking.

I think you are asking "Does anyone out there care about waveband switching?"

We might refine this question for:
a. now
b. in the next two years
c. sometime
d. never.

It is slightly interesting to look at the 9/22 respondents to the GMPLS implementation
survey (November 2002).
Of these, two are software vendors and one a test tool manufacturer. All are forced to
implement, by definition.
Of the others, one flagged "future", one was a CR-LDP product, and one a research
implementation.
So I could argue that this leaves us with just three.

question is also that i found 9 waveband labels but as implied from existing document only inverse mux or concatenated wavelength (i.e. no real band mux/ demux) can be supported as no WBSC capability has been defined


But it is probably more important to find out where we stand now.

agreed


So, question to the list...

Who believes that we need to complete the work on waveband switching in order to meet real
implementation or deployment requirements?

interestingly i found also 9 implementations supporting FSC, 7 of which were the same as those supporting Waveband label (LSC being covered by all of them except 1) this reinforces the initial assumption


thanks,
- dimitri.

Thanks,
Adrian


as mentioned in the additional ccamp webpage, this draft plugs a hole however
interest shown on this list is certainly low

but so at the end of the day one may ask if this is the case

1) how implementations that have been reported in
<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/MPLS-SIGNALING-Implementation.txt>

9 supports waveband labels so do we have to make the assumption that all of them
support only inverse multiplexing mechanism and/or wavelength concatenation ?

2) then what about Fiber SC ?

this leaves the impression that the FSC value has been sometimes used when
switching the whole content of the container (ie the fiber) while following a
strict interpretation it is meant to only address spatial switching per GMPLS ARCH:

"5. Fiber-Switch Capable (FSC) interfaces:

   Interfaces that switch data based on a position of the data in the
   (real world) physical spaces. An example of such an interface is
   that of a PXC or OXC that can operate at the level of a single or
   multiple fibers."

thanks,
- dimitri.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-douville-ccamp-gmpls-waveband-extensions-05.txt
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:33:35 -0400
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


Title : Extensions to Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching in support of Waveband Switching Author(s) : R. Douville, et al. Filename : draft-douville-ccamp-gmpls-waveband-extensions-05.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2004-7-22

Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) extends the MPLS
   control plane to encompass layer 2, time-division, wavelength and
   spatial switching. Along with the current development on IP over
   optical switching, considerable advances in optical transport
   systems based on the multiple optical switching granularities have
   been developed.

   Currently, GMPLS considers two layers of optical granularity using
   wavelengths and fibers. By introducing an extended definition of
   waveband switching, this document specifies the corresponding GMPLS
   extensions, to further integrate optical multi-granularity and
   benefit from the features of the corresponding switching layers.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:


http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-douville-ccamp-gmpls-waveband-extensions-05.txt


To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to
i-d-announce-request@ietf.org with the word unsubscribe in the body of the
message.
You can also visit https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce
to change your subscription settings.


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-douville-ccamp-gmpls-waveband-extensions-05.txt".

A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt


Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.


Send a message to:
mailserv@ietf.org.
In the body type:
"FILE /internet-drafts/draft-douville-ccamp-gmpls-waveband-extensions-05.txt".

NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail readers
exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
"multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
how to manipulate these messages.


Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce





.