Re-opt [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status]

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Dimitri,

> > 1. Loose Path Re-optimization
> > draft-vasseur-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-02.txt
> > This draft is stable and has an implementation.
> > The work is predominantly pertinent to inter-domain signaling, but could also be used
> > within a domain.
> > The meeting in San Diego reported relatively few as having read the draft, but no
> > objection to it becoming a WG draft.
> 
> is it part of the consensus to use this as a common document for further 
> work related to "re-optimization" (incl. the delivery of ubiquitous 
> signaling solution decoupled from the routing topology) in this case i'd 
> be fine

This was my interpretation of the purpose of this draft.

I would be happy to hear objections to this view point.

Adrian