[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Working Group Last Call draft-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt

To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call draft-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
From: Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:30:22 -0400
Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <001601c49e4d$e1e3f560$2b919ed9@Puppy>
References: <001601c49e4d$e1e3f560$2b919ed9@Puppy>

All, I just resubmitted the draft with the proper ID boiler plate. This will also have the nice side affect of keeping the draft from expiring during the last call period. No changes were made to the body of the draft, so comments can be made on either -00 or -01.

Lou

At 09:36 AM 9/19/2004, Adrian Farrel wrote:

As agreed in San Diego, this email begins a two week Working Group Last call on draft-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt

Please send your comments to the list or in private to the WG chairs by 12 noon GMT 3rd October.
Thanks,
Adrian

References:
- Working Group Last Call draft-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
  - From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Prev by Date: response to the OIF communication
Next by Date: Last Call: 'Link Management Protocol Management Information Base' to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Working Group Last Call draft-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
Next by thread: Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread