[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RE : Your input: Use of PCE in Inter-domain
- To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: RE : Your input: Use of PCE in Inter-domain
- From: "Francois Le Faucheur \(flefauch\)" <flefauch@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:09:23 +0200
Hello,
Many requirements that would be well addressed by a PCE based approach were presented by SPs at the PCE BOF in LA. A very significant proportion of those involved inter-domain environments.
My opinion is that PCE is clearly "addresing an inter-domain problem that needs to be addressed" and is "an acceptable way to resolve the problem" .
Francois
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] De la part de Adrian Farrel
>>Envoyé : mardi 19 octobre 2004 21:11
>>À : ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>>Cc : adrian@olddog.co.uk
>>Objet : Your input: Use of PCE in Inter-domain
>>
>>
>>Folks,
>>
>>The chairs and ADs would like your input on
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ash-pce-architecture-
>00.txt in the
>context of our inter-domain traffic engineering work.
>
>This draft documents an architecture for Path Computation
>Elements (PCE) and
>is currently being discussed on the pce mailing list
>(https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce)
>
>What we would like CCAMP to do is give us your opinion on
>whether PCE is
>addresing an inter-domain problem that needs to be addressed,
>and if so
>whether the architecture provides an acceptable way to resolve
>the problem.
>
>Answers to the mailing list in advance of the meeting in
>Washington would be
>appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian and Kireeti