RE: Your input: Use of PCE in Inter-domain

["Dean Cheng \(dcheng\)" <dcheng@cisco.com>]

The solution as suggested by the PCE I-D and on-going
work do provide a practical way to solve inter-domain
TE routing problem, which has been discussed in the
CCAMP for a while. While there are several solution
models to solve the problem, perhaps the two common
ones are to rely on the ABR/ASBR and the out-of-band 
route server. The I-D however defines the PCE in a
generic manner that can be with both of these, so
is very well in-line with the problem solving effort.

Dean  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:11 PM
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk
>Subject: Your input: Use of PCE in Inter-domain
>
>
>Folks, 
>
>The chairs and ADs would like your input on 
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ash-pce-architecture-
>00.txt in the 
>context of our inter-domain traffic engineering work. 
>
>This draft documents an architecture for Path Computation 
>Elements (PCE) and 
>is currently being discussed on the pce mailing list 
>(https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce) 
>
>What we would like CCAMP to do is give us your opinion on 
>whether PCE is 
>addresing an inter-domain problem that needs to be addressed, 
>and if so 
>whether the architecture provides an acceptable way to resolve 
>the problem. 
>
>Answers to the mailing list in advance of the meeting in 
>Washington would be 
>appreciated. 
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian and Kireeti 
>
> 
>
>
>