[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New charter

Hi Kireeti,

On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:22 AM, Kireeti Kompella wrote:

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kireeti Kompella wrote:

If you have suggested charter updates, please send them to Adrian
and me.


Thanks all for your input.  I have the following items; for each,
please say "Yes" (should be added to CCAMP charter), "No" (should not
be added) or "-" (don't care).  I'll remind you once again that not
all items will make it onto the new charter.

Please keep this subject line (simply reply to this mail).  The
deadline is Friday Dec 3, 17:00 PST.

1) MPLS-GMPLS migration

yes 
2) GMPLS interoperability issues

yes 
3a) should the IETF take on L1VPNs?
3b) if yes to 3a, should this be done in CCAMP?

yes 
4) Waveband switching

yes 
5) Control plane work

yes 
6) Decoder ring for addresses

- 
7) Deployment considerations for GMPLS

yes 
8) PCE requirements

More precisely "PCE requirements for Inter-domain" which is the main objective of the potential future WG.
Other PCE requirements amy either be done in the PCE WG or may come from other WG in the future, 
9) QoS control

yes

JP.

A rough idea of what each of the above entails follows.

1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
	implementation shift from "MPLS" objects to "GMPLS" objects
	BCP on deployment migration for the same

2) GMPLS interoperability issues
	what addresses to use where
	nits/clarifications of the specs
	guidelines for path computation & constraints
	survay

3) L1VPN work items
	identify protocol extensions needed
	state what can already be done with what we have
	do the actual protocol work for requirements that are not met
	liaisons to SG13 as needed

5) Control plane work
	resiliency
	graceful shutdown

6) Decoder ring for addresses
	for each address field, identify its nature and ITU equivalent
	(may overlap with part of (2))


4, 7-9 are obvious or have been elaborated on the mailing list.

Kireeti.
-------

PS: The topic of GTTP has carefully been avoided.  More later.