Re: New charter

[Arthi Ayyangar <arthi@juniper.net>]

Kireeti,

My pick for the four most important items are:-

o 7) and in order for 7) to work out, we would need to address 1) and 2)
o 3)
o 8)
o 5)

thanks,
-arthi

> Thanks all for your input.  I have the following items; for each,
> please say "Yes" (should be added to CCAMP charter), "No" (should not
> be added) or "-" (don't care).  I'll remind you once again that not
> all items will make it onto the new charter.
>
> Please keep this subject line (simply reply to this mail).  The
> deadline is Friday Dec 3, 17:00 PST.
>
> 1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
> 2) GMPLS interoperability issues
> 3a) should the IETF take on L1VPNs?
> 3b) if yes to 3a, should this be done in CCAMP?
> 4) Waveband switching
> 5) Control plane work
> 6) Decoder ring for addresses
> 7) Deployment considerations for GMPLS
> 8) PCE requirements
> 9) QoS control
>
> A rough idea of what each of the above entails follows.
>
> 1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
> 	implementation shift from "MPLS" objects to "GMPLS" objects
> 	BCP on deployment migration for the same
>
> 2) GMPLS interoperability issues
> 	what addresses to use where
> 	nits/clarifications of the specs
> 	guidelines for path computation & constraints
> 	survay
>
> 3) L1VPN work items
> 	identify protocol extensions needed
> 	state what can already be done with what we have
> 	do the actual protocol work for requirements that are not met
> 	liaisons to SG13 as needed
>
> 5) Control plane work
> 	resiliency
> 	graceful shutdown
>
> 6) Decoder ring for addresses
> 	for each address field, identify its nature and ITU equivalent
> 	(may overlap with part of (2))
>
>
> 4, 7-9 are obvious or have been elaborated on the mailing list.
>
> Kireeti.
> -------
>
> PS: The topic of GTTP has carefully been avoided.  More later.
>