[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE : draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-00.txt to WG status?

Hi Adrian, all

>Should this become a WG draft?

Yes

>Is it fine to include stitching in this draft, or does the 
>wider applicability of stitching mean that it should be pulled 
>out into a separate draft?

As you mention stiching could be used in other contexts (e.g. to support legacy LSR in P2MP)
So I would say that it could be better to pull it into a separate draft.
But I have no objection for including in this draft.

Regards,

JL



>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] De la part de Adrian Farrel
>Envoyé : mardi 7 décembre 2004 15:43
>À : ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Cc : Kireeti Kompella; Arthi Ayyangar; JP Vasseur
>Objet : draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-00.txt to WG status?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>As documented in the minutes from Washington DC, we discussed 
>whether to make this draft an WG document.
>
>A show of hands in the room indicated that there were no 
>objections but that not many had read the draft. So, two 
>questions for the list...
>
>Should this become a WG draft?
>Is it fine to include stitching in this draft, or does the 
>wider applicability of stitching mean that it should be pulled 
>out into a separate draft?
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>
>