RE: draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-00.txt to WG status?

["Zafar Ali" <zali@cisco.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 9:43 AM
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Cc: Kireeti Kompella; Arthi Ayyangar; JP Vasseur
>Subject: draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-00.txt to WG status?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>As documented in the minutes from Washington DC, we discussed 
>whether to make this draft an WG document.
>
>A show of hands in the room indicated that there were no 
>objections but that not many had read the draft. So, two 
>questions for the list...
>
>Should this become a WG draft?

Yes, 

>Is it fine to include stitching in this draft, or does the 
>wider applicability of stitching mean that it should be pulled 
>out into a separate draft?

It's already integrated nicely in the draft, moving it to a different ID is
IMO just an overhead. 

>
>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>