Response to ITU-T liaison on LMP transport terminology

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi,

I think it would be good if we could construct a response to the ITU-T
liaison about the use of terminology in the LMP transport draft.

Ideally we would send this to the Q14/15 rapporteur on or before 16th
January so that it can be read by everyone before the meeting later in the
month.

Is anyone prepared to step up and craft some text? Perhaps the draft's
authors have a little something to say?

I'm prepared to do the necessary work to put it into an appropriate
format.

By the way, if anyone has personal opinions about this terminology that
they want to raise for the meeting, they should send them to Kam Lam
(hklam@lucent.com) before 16th January so that he can take them as
contributions to the meeting.

Happy New Year,
Adrian