Re: Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-

[JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>]

Hi Arthi,

On Jan 20, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Arthi Ayyangar wrote:

> Adrian, all,
>
> Just a few comments on this draft.
>
> Section 2 and elsewhere: there are repeated statements & notes as to  
> "CSPF
> or any other PCE-based path computation method"
> --> I don't think it is relevant to this document whether the path
> computation is local or remote or done by a PCE or not. IMO, it would  
> be
> enough to just say "path computation".

This was for the sake of illustration but I agree of course. Text  
updated, thanks.

> Paragraph 4 in Section 3, Section 4.2, and 2nd and 3rd paragraphs in  
> 5.3.2
> ----> This draft not only refers to another draft (and it is *not* a
> normative reference) draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-00.txt, but
> also seems to introduce error codes and subcodes (subcode 7 & 8) which  
> are
> actually relevant to GR-SHUTDOWN draft rather than this document. IMO,  
> if
> graceful-shutdown procedures need new error codes/subcodes, they must  
> be
> introduced in the graceful-shutdown draft and not in this  
> re-optimization
> draft. Otherwise, what is the point of having the other draft if the
> codes are being standardized here ?

Agree, ref to GR-SHUTDOWN has been removed and draft GR-SHUTDOWN will  
be updated accordingly.

Thanks for your comments.

JP.

> thanks,
> -arthi
>
> So the
> > This email starts a two week last call on
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path- 
> > reopt-00.txt
> >
> > Please send your comments to the list or to the chairs by noon GMT on  
> > 20th
> > January 2005.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian and Kireeti