Re: lmp linkcorrelation error code

[<fab12@freesurf.fr>]

Thanks Adrian,

But which one 0x01 or 0x02? Both (seems a bit contradictory)?

Section 12.6.3 list the error case but I don't see which one corresponds to
a "wrong interface mapping".
TE Link object and datalink object are negotiable object and interface Ids
are inside those objects.
But I don't think we can considere interface (or TE link) Id as negotiable?

What do you think?

Thanks
Fab



The TE
> Fab,
>
> See section 13.15.
>
>        0x01 =Unacceptable non-negotiable LINK_SUMMARY parameters. 0x02
>        =Renegotiate LINK_SUMMARY parameters.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <fab12@freesurf.fr>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:25 AM
> Subject: lmp linkcorrelation error code
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-10 section 4 about link corelation states that
>> a "LinkSummaryNack message MUST be transmitted, indicating which
> interface
>> mapping and/or which properties are not accepted"
>>
>> In case of wrong interface mapping which error code should be encoded
>> in the linkSummaryNack?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Fab