RE: question about RFC 3946

["Richard Rabbat" <richard.rabbat@us.fujitsu.com>]

Dimitri,
Thanks for the answer.
Now, STS-3c and VC-4 share the same signal type. 
Should they still be formed differently?
Richard.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
> [mailto:Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:58 AM
> To: Richard Rabbat
> Cc: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be; 
> eric_mannie@hotmail.com; 'Sadler, Jonathan B.'; 'Ong, 
> Lyndon'; 'Adrian Farrel'; 'Richard Rabbat'; 
> ccamp@ops.ietf.org; 'Greg Bernstein'
> Subject: Re: question about RFC 3946
> 
> 
> 
> richard:
> 
> "greater" does not mean "strictly greater" it means "greater or equal"
> 
> So, what values of NCC and RCC should one use for STS-3c/VC-4?
> 
> for STS-3c:
>         An STS-3c SPE signal is formed by the application of RCC with
>         value 1 (standard contiguous concatenation), NCC with value 1,
>         NVC with value 0, MT with value 1 and T with value 0 
> to an STS-
>         3c SPE Elementary Signal.
> 
> for VC-4:
>         A VC-4 signal is formed by the application of RCC 
> with value 0,
>         NCC with value 0, NVC with value 0, MT with value 1 and T with
>         value 0 to a VC-4 Elementary Signal.
> 
> do not know if this clarifies -
> 
> hint: Note 2 refers to transparent STS-N/STM-N signals 
> (signal type 7->12)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>