Re: comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-08.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi Tom,

> A minor comment; this document has
>  false (0),
> in several places; following RFC 2579, I think this should be
>  false (2)

Good catch. This is in the example which is why we didn't catch it by
compiling.

> A larger question,; this mib augments tables in the mpls mib (RFC3812);
is there
> a reason why the AUGMENTS construct was not used?

This is not my area of expertise!
I think that there are two strict augmentations and in these cases
AUGMENTS was used.

The other cases are, I believe, extensions.

I *think* the difference is that an AUGMENT is always present and an
extension is only present if used.
(Feels like I'm on shaky ground!)

Cheers,
Adrian