Re: Addressing doc

["Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>]

Igor,
          my two cents to the discussion.

In line.

Regards

Diego



Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>@ops.ietf.org on 16/04/2005 23.31.26

Sent by:    owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org


To:    Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be, Kireeti Kompella
       <kireeti@juniper.net>
cc:    ccamp@ops.ietf.org

Subject:    Re: Addressing doc


Dimitri,

Suppose a controller has just received an RSVP Path
message that contains an ERO describing a path
computed on the head-end (properly modified, of
course, along the path). ERO is specified in terms of
numbered or/and unnumbered TE links (and not IP
addresses). Now the processing controller needs to
forward the message to the controller that manages
first non-local ERO sub-object. The question is what
to set as destination in the IP header of the RSVP
Path message?
[dc] What about usage of the control channel addresses?  I mean having LMP
running between the two nodes the TNE is able to associate one or more
Control Channels to the TE Link.  In other words LMP is able to provide
adress tanslation between the data plane addresses (TE Link) and control
plane address (Control Channels).
[CUT]