RE: Addressing doc

["Richard Rabbat" <richard.rabbat@us.fujitsu.com>]

Title: Message

Hi all,

 

The editors have been having various discussions with people about some of their issues with this draft. In order to clarify a some points here are some of the changes that we plan to make to the next version of the draft. We hope this will help to clarify the draft.

 

1. In section 4.2.1, previous text:
   Alternatively, the tunnel end point address MAY also be set to the destination data plane address if the ingress knows that address or the TE Router ID.
New text:
   Alternatively, the tunnel end point address MAY also be set to the destination data plane address if the ingress knows that address.

 

2. In section 4.2.2 previous text:
   Alternatively, the tunnel sender address MAY also be set to the sender data plane address or the TE Router ID.
New text:
   Alternatively, the tunnel sender address MAY also be set to the sender data plane address.

 

3. at the end of the introduction, we will add wording to the last line to that effect:
Various more complex deployment scenarios can be constructed but these are currently out of scope as the only GMPLS implementations encountered in interoperability testing or in deployment have applied this relationship. When new implementations that include any other relationship between control plane and data plane entities are encountered, this document would be enhanced as necessary.