Re: comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-07.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your comments which we are (finally) addressing.


> I find the IANA Considerations section less than clear.  I suggest that
you
> differentiate between xx and xx, eg by using yy for GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB

OK.

> I would also reword it slightly as follows.
>
> **   MPLS and GMPLS related standards track MIB modules are rooted under
the
>    mplsStdMIB subtree.
>
>    One of the MIB modules contained in this document extends tables
>    contained in MPLS MIB modules.

OK

> **  The two MIB modules contained in this document, like that in
> GMPLS-TC-STD-MIB [GMPLSTCMIB], should be placed in the mplsStdMIB
subtree.

OK

> **   New assignments in the mplsStdMIB subtree can only be made via a
Standards
> Action as specified   in [RFC2434].

OK

> 11.2. IANA Considerations for GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB
>
> ** The IANA is requested to assign { mplsStdMIB yy } to the
>    GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB module specified in this document.

Yes, as above.

Thanks,
Adrian and Tom
(Your other emails on these MIBs will be responded to separately.)