Hi,
Thank you that you remind me the contribution.
Maybe I think that the contribution was submitted to the Seoul meeting.
My contribution (draft-kim-ccamp-intercaction-grsvpte-lcas) didn't get a chance to present at that time.
It is completely said that LCAS is controled by EMS. But, my contribution was written down to reduce the EMS overhead.
Could you happen to tell me your interesting points about my contribution ?
ASAP, I'd like to modify and re-submit the contribution after adding your comments.
-----원본 메시지-----
보낸 사람: "Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@Marconi.com>
보낸 날짜: 2005-05-31 오후 10:45:11
받는 사람: "ccamp@ops.ietf.org" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
참조:
제목: LCAS and GMPLS
Hi all,
I'd like to ask what is the statuts of the interworking between
LCAS and GMPLS. Surfing the net I've found a couple of ID about that
subject (draft-kim-ccamp-intercaction-grsvpte-lcas and
draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-tdm-lbm) but both of them seems to be expired,
I've also found some interesting discussion on this matter on the ccamp
mail archive.
Is interwoking between LCAS and GMPLS outside the scope of CCAMP?
IMHO that is not and should be addressed.
What is the feeling of the rest of the group?
Best regards
Diego