Re: no more milestones?

["inoue.ichiro@lab.ntt.co.jp" <inoue.ichiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Hi,

I agree that base signalling and routing GMPLS protocols need to be
worked out, and at the same time I would like to see GMPLS applications
in operational networks.

I remember about the vote on specific items (to-be-rechartered items) which
included basic signalling and routing aspects as well as some extended 
applications.
At that time, I felt we had a long and good discussion already about what 
would be
on the revised charter and it was very close to decide.

Now, though (because?) I don't know what process is done and further needed
beyond what we already went through and saw, I appreciate if we can see new 
milestones
reflecting the vote and recent discussions so that we can determine in Paris
hopefully without, but with some more discussion if needed.

Thanks.

Ichiro Inoue

>  >> I would like to see:
>  >> - a refinement of the charter to focus the next work items
>  >> - a year's worth of milestones to ensure we stay focused.
>  >>
>  >> On the other hand, we should aim to close down CCAMP and move the
>  >> work to
>  >> other or new working groups.
>  >>
>  >
>  > coupling both sentences does it mean in your view
>  >
>  > 1) define several short-term milestones for refining topics that
>  > have been
>  > already initiated and requires further well scoped attention
>  >
>  > 2) (brand) new topics should target new working groups - as already
>  > initiated with L1VPN for inst. - or existing working groups
>  >
>  > nevertheless, i do not see why this automatically means CCAMP can not
>  > remain the focal point concerning *base* GMPLS signaling and routing
>  > protocols
>