diego
as part of the motivation section of this document it would be indeed interesting to be much more explicit about the CP->MP handover purpose(s) before progressing on this part of the mechanism
- d.
"Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>
Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
07/20/2005 11:37 ZE2
To: Dimitri PAPADIMITRIOU/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
cc: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "gnewsome" <gnewsome@ieee.org>, "adrian" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
bcc:
Subject: RE: Moving LSP ownership between control plane and management plane
Dimitri,
yes of course the main application is MP-->CP the CP-->MP is just
for simmetry;-))
Diego
Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be on 20/07/2005 11.30.35
To: "Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>
cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org, gnewsome@ieee.org, adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: RE: Moving LSP ownership between control plane and management
plane
diego -
"My basic question is: do someone think that having a mechanism to move
MP/CP created LSP under the CP/MP domain is useless?"
no -
in part. the MP->CP handover is a key mechanism for migration toward GMPLS
CP
-dimitri.