Hello Wataru,
You wrote:
I forward a nice comment from Mr. Huub van Helvoort.
Thank you for forwarding. (I hope I can send this message the list myself).
His comments indicates we need liason from ITU-T SG-15 regarding to this issue.
This is a good proposal, it will indicate to ITU-T SG15/Q11 that IETF/CCAMP supports this enhancement.
Kind regards, Huub.
--- from message 27-7-2005 ---
One point for the problem statement could be that in order to guarantee a hitless removal of one of the members in a VCG (decrease of bandwidth) there is a mandatory sequence: First remove member at ingress node, wait for confirm and only then remove path and member at egress node.
However, a solution was presented at the last ITU-T SG15/q11 meeting that removes this requirement.
Cheers, Huub.
-- ================================================================ http://members.chello.nl/hhelvoort/ ================================================================ Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...