[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]

To: <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>, <dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be>, <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>
Subject: RE: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]
From: <richard.spencer@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:03:41 +0100
Cc: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>

Dimitri,

"why (and where) ring topologies are suitable" ?

Transport networks (e.g. SONET/SDH, WDM, RPR) have been, and will continue to be, widely deployed based on (dual) ring topologies in the access/metro because they provide fast protection and reliability whilst making efficient use of fibre.

I do not think this can be disputed so I don't understand where you are coming from with this question?

Regards,
Richard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]
  - From: dimitri papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]
Next by Date: Re: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]
Previous by thread: Re: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]
Next by thread: Re: MS-SPring [Was: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread