Of course, I think it's possible under the condition that the topic of
control plane resilience could be handled in the CCAMP charter.
-----ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÃ ÂÂÂÂÂÃAAo-----
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From Date: 2005-08-16 ÂÂAEA 8:28:11
To: "ccamp@ops.ietf.org" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "zinin@psg.com" <zinin@psg.com>, "'Kireeti Kompella'"
<kireeti@juniper.net>
Subject: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter
Hi,
Please find attached a file that contains:
- a set of proposed *draft* milestones
- a discussion of why there are so many milestones
- a high-level explanation of the work items.
Note that this looks like a lot of milestones, but please read the text on
this issue in the attached file. The bottom line is that this is a product
of micro management where I have tried to identify all of the I-Ds that we
might produce to cover the referenced work, and where I have placed two
(sometimes three) milestones for each I-D.
This micro-management may be over the top, and represents a full pendulum
swing from the previous style of CCAMP milestones, but in the light of the
hiatus of the last 12 months, i think this may be beneficial and might
achieve rapid forwards movement.
I would welcome your (constructive!) comments.
Notes:
- Why isn't my I-D also cited as input material?
No insult intended. The current list is simply there to
show the ADs that work is already in progress. All I-Ds
will be used as input.
- Why isn't my pet topic included?
Are you sure it is not there between the lines? This
list of milestones isn't completely proscriptive.
The objective is to have the WG agreed on the milestones that it wants to
commit to by the end of August.
Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message -----
From: "ÂÃÂÂÃÂ" <yhwkim@etri.re.kr>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: <zinin@psg.com>; "'Kireeti Kompella'" <kireeti@juniper.net>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter
.