[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Final draft of response to the OIF
Dimitri,
Note 2 on page 6 refers to transparent mode, which is a
different thing altogether. I think this encoding is
poorly chosen as well (and may not allow for the full
flexibility of equipment that provides various levels
of transparent STS-N/STM-N switching), but that is not
currently under discussion.
Regards,
Ben
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dimitri papadimitriou [mailto:dpapadimitriou@psg.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:38 PM
> To: Mack-Crane, T. Benjamin
> Cc: Adrian Farrel; Richard Rabbat; Huub van Helvoort;
> ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Final draft of response to the OIF
>
>
> to clarify:
>
> > The example did not adhere to the rule RCC=1 implies NCC>1
> > which was stated in the RFC (and is technically sound) thus
> > one could reasonable presume the example was in error.
>
> actually your interpretation is not correct - see note 2 of RFC 3946
> (page 6) where the settings RCC=1 can imply NCC=1 is
> explicitly stated -
>
> this said, one of the reason for this setting wrt the specific point
> raised by the OIF is due to the logic that has been used in
> making use
> of RCC and NCC value when the signal spelling include a "c" i.e.
> STS-(3xN)c SPE so for STS-3c SPE the setting is a logical
> consequence of
> N = 1
>
> however, editors have been using a wording for the generic rule which
> has not been understood as expected hence the clarification
> stated last
> march on this list - and reproduced in the bis version -
>
> in brief, all this doesn't deserve this flurry of e-mails wrt to the
> specific point to be addressed
>
>
>
>
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
============================================================