[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Two Drafts for Resilience of Control Plane



Snipped

> > >
> >
> > States are supposed to be destroyed on explicit signalling
> > message (e.g. PathTear or PathErr with the state removal
> > flag), but not because of the absence of refreshes.
> >
[JD] 

Igor,

Just to be clear, we are talking about RSVP here, and RSVP *is* a soft
state protocol.  Can you point to any RFC that supports your statements
above?

Thanks,

John