Hi,
I also support this kind of WG.
IMHO, this kind of WG is a good application for GMPLS field.
And, I think that IETF SHOULD not be a place for supporting a profit of special (vender) groups.
But, Yestday's mood is not so.
-----Original Message-----
Sender: "Michael.Dueser@t-systems.com" <Michael.Dueser@t-systems.com>
Date Sent: 2005-11-09 AM 11:00:34
Receiver: "gels@rtg.ietf.org" <gels@rtg.ietf.org>, "ccamp@ops.ietf.org" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc:
Title: Supporting the GELS work
Hi,
I believe that the wrong question was asked at the end of the GELS BoF, which didn't allow me to explicitly express support for forming a GELS working group. I would, therefore, urgently ask everybody with an interest in the GELS work to explicitly express his/her support on the mailing list so we can keep momentum and continue work on this important topic.
Many thanks,
Michael