[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Promoting 3946bis to WG status

To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Promoting 3946bis to WG status
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:08:51 -0000
Reply-to: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Hi,

We discussed this I-D in Vancouver.

It is clear that we need to update the RFC for minor changes.

Editors:
- please submit draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-rfc3946bis-00.txt
  as draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc3946bis-00.txt
- please make no changes (except date and document name)
- in particular, please leave the notes in place.

Thanks,
Adrian

Follow-Ups:
- Question about Reoptimization draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt
  - From: Faisal Aslam <faisal@telecom.lth.se>

Prev by Date: RE: Supporting the GELS work
Next by Date: Question about Reoptimization draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt
Previous by thread: Clarification on object padding for Call-ID in RFC3474
Next by thread: Question about Reoptimization draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread