yes to both two questions:1. since MLN is a special case of MRN, can we collapse this whole topic to MRN? is there a compelling reason for keeping these 2 notation? 2. Section 3 of draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-02.txt is a requirments section and therefore not relevant to this draft but belongs to draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-03.txt. there is no advantage to repeting requirements.
thanks, richard. Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi, We have a charter milestone to start WG work on a Requirements I-D for MRN/MLN, and also an Evaluation I-D to examine how the current protocols shape up to the challenge. There are two appropriate I-Ds that have been around for a while. draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-03.txt draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-02.txt I propose that we make these WG documents and then give them a thorough review and edit. Opinions please. Yes or no will suffice, but reasons are always nice. Thanks, Adrian