Re: Polling for new WG IDs

[Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>]

Hi,

 

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 

Yes. I believe all the comments which also have been summarized in Adrian's email (on Sept. 15th) have been addressed in the revised draft.

 

Thanks,

 

Dan

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS

To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org

Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:23 AM

Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,

 

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

 

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

 

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

 

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

 

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian