[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Distribution CPG Protocol

To: Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>, Alex French <afrench@vianetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Distribution CPG Protocol
From: "Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortelnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:07:47 -0500
Cc: Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>, Eric Dean <eric@crystalballinc.com>, Phil Rzewski <philr@inktomi.com>, cdn <cdn@ops.ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:06:27 -0800
Envelope-to: cdn-data@psg.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex French" <afrench@vianetworks.com>

> Surely the reason for having this metric is to make comparisons between
> CDNs. If each CDN calculates the metric in a different way, how can they
be
> compared? Or am I missing something?

i thought the metric could be agreed upon between cdn's (paired) and they
will worry about.
(local vs global signifigance type senario)

abbie

Prev by Date: Re: Distribution CPG Protocol
Next by Date: RE: Distribution CPG Protocol
Prev by thread: Re: Distribution CPG Protocol
Next by thread: RE: Distribution CPG Protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread