Content Provider input

[Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>]

Phil Rzewski writes:
 > Or 
 > is the possibility of having a solution for "power user" Content Providers 
 > just a coincidental side-effect of designing a solution by CDNs, and for CDNs?
 > 

Phil,

	I am not working for a pure content provider so I can't answer
you original question. However, I would like to point out that building
a solution for CDNs caries value by itself. CDNs already offer a 
service. If we are successful CDN peering should allow us to offer
at least the same service better and cheaper. This alone seems
like a good motivation to me.

On the other hand I agree with you it would be nice if we could know
if their are any new features (more than a CDN offers) content providers
want.

Oliver