RE: patent language for all drafts

["Mark Day" <markday@cisco.com>]

> Can we use more generic language, saying that the IETF has been
> or will be
> apprised of any company's intellectual property?

I very much like this idea. But instead of us reinventing this, could we
perhaps hear from someone who has written such language in another WG or
from an AD? (Or find out that "generic" language doesn't work).

Editors, please put the requested change(s) on hold until we get a reading
on this point. Thanks.

--Mark