[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Query re request Routing

To: Steve Rudkin <srudkin@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Query re request Routing
From: Eric Dean <eric@crystalballinc.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 09:19:55 -0500 (EST)
cc: Gary Tomlinson <gary.tomlinson@cacheflow.com>, Phil Rzewksi <philr@inktomi.com>, cdn@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 06:20:54 -0800
Envelope-to: cdn-data@psg.com


> The question to answer then is: should distribution and/or accounting
> peering necessitate a basic level of request routing peering (namely the
> ability to handover authority to route certain requests for given content
> units)?

I would also consider for what scenarios we can build such an
interworking.  For example, this may be possible for the CNAME scenario in
Section 3.4 draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-02.txt

Prev by Date: Query re request Routing
Next by Date: RE: Query re request Routing
Prev by thread: Query re request Routing
Next by thread: RE: Query re request Routing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread